S. Purtseladze
To Win
C. Ilkel
To Win
Marc Dijkhuizen vs Saba Purtseladze Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L W W L L
Form
W L W W W W W W W WHead-2-Head: Dijkhuizen 1 - 0 Purtseladze
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dijkhuizen winning 2 and Purtseladze winning 0. The last match between Dijkhuizen and Purtseladze was at the M15 Antalya, 04-12-2019, First, Clay with Marc Dijkhuizen getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marc Dijkhuizen | 1 |
| Saba Purtseladze | 0 |
M15 Antalya(04-12-2019)
6
3
6
1
| Dijkhuizen | Stats | Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 80% (36-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 366 |
| Highest Rank | 365 | |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 9 |
| 50% (114-114) | Career Total W/L | 55% (191-158) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dijkhuizen VS Purtseladze H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Marc Dijkhuizen
Player
Saba Purtseladze
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Dijkhuizen VS Purtseladze H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:9:0 | Average Match Time | 1:9:0 |
| 76% (42/55) | 1st Serve % | 71% (37/52) |
| 67% (28/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 85% (11/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (9/15) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/7) |
| 50% (26/52) | Return Points Win % | 29% (16/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marc Dijkhuizen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zachary Eisinga
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
23
Total Points Won
9
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Marc Dijkhuizen
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Saba Purtseladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Hamish Stewart
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Karim Ibrahim
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Sebastien Lhuillier
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michal Krajci
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
18
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
37 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Lorenzo Rottoli
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Erik Arutiunian
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
135)
20
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
40%
(
22 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
49 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
135)
133
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Saba Purtseladze
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Boris Butulija
49%
(
41 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
6
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (114/114) | Win/Loss | 55% (191/158) |
| 50% (253/254) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (428/368) |
| 50% (2277/2260) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3913/3695) |
| 52% (34/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (162/100) |
| 49% (80/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 35% (26/49) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.66 |
| 183 | Aces Total | 2467 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 412 | Total Double Faults | 1046 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:28:28 |
| 356.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.55 |
| 59% (3992/6716) | 1st Serve % | 57% (11886/20992) |
| 62% (2470/3992) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (8827/11886) |
| 46% (1251/2724) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4466/9106) |
| 42% (311/749) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (794/1907) |
| 41% (2768/6720) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7893/20873) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 36% (16/29) |
| 50% (114/114) | Futures W/L | 58% (172/124) |
| 51% (114/225) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (189/338) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 41% (14/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (56/120) |
| 54% (29/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (59/105) |
| 87% (118/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (186/160) |
| 13% (118/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (186/24) |
| 10% (110/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (163/31) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
